Posts Tagged ‘Volatility’
We have had an unusually high number of high volume down days lately, which were topped off with a massive down yesterday, July 27th. The Nasdaq with its 2.6% had its largest loss in five months. Market action in the major indexes constituted yet another 90% panic selling down day.
I have said several times earlier that third year bull markets typically are trendless, and this year is continuing to prove to be typical in that respect. The S&P 500 has mainly traded between 1,250 and 1,350 all year. IBD illustrates the lack of trend in the market well in today’s newspaper: “Last year, the Nasdaq had an eight-week win streak in the first half and then rose in 10 of 11 weeks in the second half. Those kinds of streaks make for good trading. So far this year, the longest up streak on the Nasdaq has been three weeks.” This market action calls for increased patience and continued adherence to your trading rules. Remember that a new trend will eventually emerge.
The reason for increased volatility lately is due to the lack of agreement between US politicians on how to handle the debt situation. But such discussions are not a new phenomenon; they have been going on for about three quarters of a century. As Ritholtz.com reports: “The regular debt ceiling limit dance seems to evoke a fairly standard set of behaviors in the two major US political parties: Whichever party is out of power (White House, or Congress or both) threatens not to support raising the debt ceiling. Which ever party is in power talks about how irresponsible and dangerous such a move would be.”
I don’t think the market has much to fear as I assume that they will reach a solution shortly. Yet another short-term solution that is. But yesterday, uncertainty became a little too high for the market participants to handle and a enough collected their chips to turn the market around. There is a clear risk that the US will be downgraded, and as I have stated many times before I believe this will eventually happen, and I also believe that the US will go bankrupt, or come into a situation that would seem like a close relative to it. But if that decline to bankruptcy starts with this downtrend or not I cannot tell. History shows that no systematic changes are made until our whole financial system collapses, first at that point is there enough political will to make any substantial changes. And substantial changes are what is needed. The way we run our economy, on borrowed and printed money, is not sustainable in the long term. This is an economic experiment that we to a more or less extend have been running, and gotten addicted to, since the Great Depression. The longer it has run the more we have gotten addicted to it. If you feel like reading more on this topic read this excellent column from Bloomberg News.
I have no clear perspective on the exact time for this collapse, and since I do not do any short term forecasting (only medium term and long term) I continue following my model which will in due course indicate when it is safer to enter a long-position in the market again. Remember that this is the same model that kept you out of the stock market during the crash of 2008 and indicated that it was “safe” to enter the market again on March 16th, 2009 just a few days after the market bottomed out. The model would have helped you avoid one of the last 100 year’s largest declines and also let you know when to return to the market again to participate in one of the last 100 year’s most rapid upturns!
A pretty short addition this time, but it does contain some extremely important information like:
- More (dark?) omens have been observed in the market over the past week
- There is always something we can learn from history – a small study of the crash of 1987 and 2008